Skip to main content

Secular Church in a Spiritual World


A Reaction to John Drane's, The McDonaldization of the Church: 
Consumer Culture and the Church’s Future. 2001 (215 pages).
                “If our faith was to make a difference to our nation…we could not continue to do the same things as our forebears had done before us” so we need to “find new ways of being church”—the church needs to “reinvent itself'. “the spread of Western influence during the last five hundred years or so has had a profound impact on the way today’s world has developed”. The sociological “bending” culture has is something that hadn’t clicked for me like it had before. In other words, culture has a developmental impact on people—it trains people to be the way they are.
                So what are we to make of this developmental influence culture has on the people who are coming into the church? Is the church infected by it? Is it ready for and proactive about it? Drane picks apart the “values that have shaped our culture” by aligning them with the "McDonaldization" of society ...and the church. Drane gives several conceptualized sets for communicating what is going on around us and does a great job in explaining the great fault of “formalized rationality”. But a question I am left with is the founding of the maxim—Does it hold true that the more mechanized we become the more dehumanizing also?
                “In a world where we have lost touch with our emotions…many find the only way left open for them to express grief for their [loss]…is by either acting out their anger or covering it up…” (19). Drane goes on to connect risk and extreme sports to this “acting out and covering up” tactics people use to cope—people are inventing ways to "keep themselves amused.”
                We would do well in understanding McDonaldization and its process more than just seeing how it is played out in the church today. If the church is just another reflection of the mechanized world people find themselves droned into, then it stands to reason that coming to church is just more of the same--where people are a statistic, a means to an end. One can see why people do not want to attend a church like that. We need to look at ways to De-McDonadlize our church experiences. It seems we have a secular church in a spiritual world today.

Popular posts from this blog

I Wish We'd All Been ... Left Behind

  Perhaps you have heard the group DC Talk sing the remake of Larry Norman’s’ song, “I Wish We’d All Been Ready”? There is something tragically deceptive about the lyrics though. As we sing along, we find ourselves participating in a couple instances where we wish we had been ready to be taken instead of left behind. But that is not how Jesus tells his side of the story. The words are inspired by Matthew 24:40-41. But let’s look more closely, shall we? MATTHEW 24:37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away . That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. 41 Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left. ...

IN ESSENTIALS, UNITY

I just had a board meeting where I went over a study on the word "unity" and "divisions." The question that immediately came up was, "Well, Christians don't have to agree on everything...right?" My response went something like this, "Well, wouldn't we want to?" It hit the fan like a lead balloon, which is not at all what I had expected. I thought all of the other board members would be shouting, "Yes!" and giving me high-fives and chest bumps. Well, maybe not chest bumps at this age.  There were some other ideas, thoughts and opinions expressed, and I was like, "We just went over this study of like 25 verses that state we are to be unified and have no divisions among us. Why don't you get it?" Seems like I was the one who actually didn't get it. It wasn't that I thought my interpretations were wrong, the weren't. The question centered around their application. "How in the world are we to agree on e...

Review: Evangelism More Caught than Taught

I teach Evangelism & Discipleship I & II online for a Christian University in Ohio. I was looking over an assignment that really threw me for a curve because the exercise goes against what the course is teaching. The course uses as one of its textbooks, Becoming a Contagious Christian: Communicating Your Faith in a Style that Fits You, which teaches that there are several ways of evangelizing referred to as "styles" and that there isn't only one acceptable way. Those styles are: Direct style, Intellectual style, Invitational style, and Serving style. Then the course has students read an article that emphasizes one style (Direct, or perhaps Intellectual) and asks them to attempt to do so. The article gives the following statement for its rationale: "We are dedicated to equipping people for evangelism, not because large numbers follow us, but because it is the command Jesus gave to His followers. We don’t take others with us for OJT because it’s c...

Family Time Videos