Skip to main content

Rethinking the Youth Pastor

I read an article recently that put into words some of the things I have been thinking about regarding youth pastors, more specifically, should churches hire "youth pastors" any more. April Diaz's comments were on track with several things I have been contemplating after growing up in church (18 years of embeded ministry) and being involved in youth ministry (volunteer+part-time+full-time ministry) for around 30 years.

You can read the article here: http://fulleryouthinstitute.org/articles/redefining-the-youth-worker

Here are some highlights from that article:

Hiring a "Student Integration Pastor"
Changing the title from Youth Pastor of Director of Youth Ministries isn't enough, but one that reflects the "Philosophical Shifts" the church is seeking to make.

Integrating teenagers into the life of the church is an "all-church" mentality, project, and overall big idea.

Creating a third culture = a “new way” of not doing ministry but of being the church, the kingdom of God on this planet and involved in our culture. An intergenerational approach to youth ministry is the way to go. Ever since my internship in Duncanville, TX I have always had this model filed away in the back of mind as one of the best plans of the church.


Smaller really is better. Think about it. Would you rather have a crowd of 70 who were half-life into religion or a dozen or even a half dozen who were totally transformed into disciples of Jesus?

I was reflecting on this about a week ago and believe that the six committed kids in the youth group I grew up who met on Sunday nights to go through a discipleship plan put together by two older ladies in our church was one of the best plans ever. But get this: I HATED ATTENDING! Hate may be too strong of a word choice here ... I only went because my parents made me, my friends being there gave me some consolation and minor motivation, and the leaders made us do stuff I did not want to do. BUT I grew and I remembered! I can still remember the nightly routine and the challenges she gave to us. Had I known then the impact that would have made on me today I would have tweaked it just a tad with their methods, but their model was sound.

An entire church investment to change. Many times April says those magical words, "WE!"
"We put a stake in the ground"... "We believe" ... "we determined" and "we must take a closer look at the families within the church as well."

I especially like this paragraph:

Every family has something to offer. We would look for those strengths, call them out, and invite our families to help us develop our teenagers. Far too often and for too long, the students’ immediate families and their spiritual family have been downplayed in our efforts to create safe youth ministry havens for teenagers. We believe it takes a village to raise a child, and that village needs to be much larger than a siloed youth ministry.

So many times we are limited but only because we have built the program to be that way.

I will end with the same "Questions to Consider" in the article but include my answers as well.
  • What about the idea of “redefining the youth worker role” resonates with you? It resonates with me because there are so many good things from youth ministries in the past that this model puts together in one model.
  • What are some of the unique characteristics about your context that will frame your conversation prior to any changes? We actually have several families in the church we are now in that this will work; they are good, strong, faithful and have the energy NOW to contribute to this and invest in it for so many reasons, but mostly because it is a plan and has the biblical promise of working by God's grace!
  • Where are these desirable characteristics already at work in your church? Top-heavy leadership and lack of strong (multi-faceted) communication are always a big issue. A more parental involvement approach would mark this up several notches to seeing it done.

  • Who else needs to be part of this conversation? Hmmm. Since communication is a valid issue, the approachable quality will need to be focused on. Perhaps in  time?

Popular posts from this blog

Banning Influencers at Church?

 You might be getting The Pour Over into your inbox each day as I do. As I read one of the highlighted articles, Why are cafes, restaurants, and even towns banning influences ?  I thought of two things: A popular video game and the Church. The [Galactic Civ] video game action arena is space and utilizes exploring with several different tactics. One is cultural expansion deploying techniques for taking over the galaxy using mods to influence other traveling species with your culture and therefore "quietly" take over the galaxy and win the game. You could also win by buying up all of the other planets (economic takeover--think China?), or by hostile takeovers and warfare (think Russia?).  I like to use the cultural takeover mostly these days. The article lists the reasons for the ban, one is logistical (small-town shops cannot handle triple+ visitors due to a rise in popularity resulting in more harm than good). I imagined a small church of older people spiking due to a popular

Revelation's Whore as Today's Culture

  https://thehustle.co/originals/why-you-almost-never-see-a-clock-at-the-mall The word “whore” may have different definitions to some, but I want to use it as a woman who markets herself for the sole purpose of robbing men of their life for her own gain--whatever her “gain” is: monetary, lust, or otherwise. She is the reverse-consumer and profiteer at the same time, a vampiress, a luxurious drunk, functioning alcoholic. Her appeal is a marketing scheme based on not just years of study, but an exquisite composition of research and development where she is both scientist and evidence, psychologist and client--in an endless cycle and sinister feedback loop of trial and error, hypothesis and investigation, feeding and consuming. All the while tricking you into believing you are the main character. But it isn’t about you. You have entered her Nirvana constructed for you to “remain inside” her. Once her legs are wrapped around you, she is sure to suck your life away. And as titillating a

Who you going to call?

I had a coworker who was a very-likeable person, but seemed in competition with everyone. He was a funny guy, I'll give him that, but most of the time engaged in rather shallow conversations. He knew a little about everything, which caused him to have an opinion about . . . well, everything. And his wit made you want to listen. Most of the time, it is a fun, light-hearted space to work in. Likeable people, are just that: likeable. There are several people I have worked with over the years like this--very friendly, likeable, fairly easy to talk to, yet never really wanted to go deeper. In fact, if conversation turned that way, they became uncomfortable and either remained silent, tried to change the subject, or simply left the circle.  We all need someone we can go deep with. This is the kind of person you'd want to tell others you know or ask if they do. They are not the kind of person you'd call if your spouse ended up in the hospital, or your parent died, or your kid was

Family Time Videos