Skip to main content

Banning Influencers at Church?

 You might be getting The Pour Over into your inbox each day as I do. As I read one of the highlighted articles, Why are cafes, restaurants, and even towns banning influences? I thought of two things: A popular video game and the Church.

The [Galactic Civ] video game action arena is space and utilizes exploring with several different tactics. One is cultural expansion deploying techniques for taking over the galaxy using mods to influence other traveling species with your culture and therefore "quietly" take over the galaxy and win the game. You could also win by buying up all of the other planets (economic takeover--think China?), or by hostile takeovers and warfare (think Russia?).  I like to use the cultural takeover mostly these days.

The article lists the reasons for the ban, one is logistical (small-town shops cannot handle triple+ visitors due to a rise in popularity resulting in more harm than good). I imagined a small church of older people spiking due to a popular preacher visiting and having no nursery. That'd be bad. Not just for the weeks the speaker was in town, but the 'community talk' for weeks after about what the church 'didn't have' verses what it did.

The line from the article that caused me to pause and think about my church was, "Most places want sustainable customer-bases," and not a descending swarm to come in, consume, and move on. This hit me hard, but so did the next observation which spoke about places banning phones and picture-taking "in order to protect the presence of the experience for those who are there for the substance."

Protecting the presence. Should we question the use of streaming services? 

I am in agreement in principle with the desire for sustainable customer-bases; I think believers call this a 'church family.' But churches might always have to deal with FOMO and YOLO of those casual subscribers who look like visitors who've been in-and-out for a decade never commiting to the base but comfortable with clocking in and out of what is supposed to be a service--an activity that is about Someone else. When did family become a buffet?

The article bemoans the trend in these locusts/influencers who have "a sense of misplaced ownership over both private and public spaces." I used to think Judgment Day would be a video vignette of my life, but it could actually be much easier by just scrolling through my social media posts to see what was most important to me.

I'm not promoting banning things in church, but might we think on it for a moment? Take a personal inventory. Leave your phone at home like we did when we were kids, and college students, and first married (for those born in the 60s and 70s). It might just change your life. I'd hope at least your worship, which is all about Him and not just a post.

Popular posts from this blog

Revelation's Whore as Today's Culture

  https://thehustle.co/originals/why-you-almost-never-see-a-clock-at-the-mall The word “whore” may have different definitions to some, but I want to use it as a woman who markets herself for the sole purpose of robbing men of their life for her own gain--whatever her “gain” is: monetary, lust, or otherwise. She is the reverse-consumer and profiteer at the same time, a vampiress, a luxurious drunk, functioning alcoholic. Her appeal is a marketing scheme based on not just years of study, but an exquisite composition of research and development where she is both scientist and evidence, psychologist and client--in an endless cycle and sinister feedback loop of trial and error, hypothesis and investigation, feeding and consuming. All the while tricking you into believing you are the main character. But it isn’t about you. You have entered her Nirvana constructed for you to “remain inside” her. Once her legs are wrapped around you, she is sure to suck your life away. And as titillating a

Who you going to call?

I had a coworker who was a very-likeable person, but seemed in competition with everyone. He was a funny guy, I'll give him that, but most of the time engaged in rather shallow conversations. He knew a little about everything, which caused him to have an opinion about . . . well, everything. And his wit made you want to listen. Most of the time, it is a fun, light-hearted space to work in. Likeable people, are just that: likeable. There are several people I have worked with over the years like this--very friendly, likeable, fairly easy to talk to, yet never really wanted to go deeper. In fact, if conversation turned that way, they became uncomfortable and either remained silent, tried to change the subject, or simply left the circle.  We all need someone we can go deep with. This is the kind of person you'd want to tell others you know or ask if they do. They are not the kind of person you'd call if your spouse ended up in the hospital, or your parent died, or your kid was

Family Time Videos