Skip to main content

Regaining God's Goodness in Creation

A reaction to Albert M. Wolters, Creation Regained: Biblical Basics for a Reformational Worldview, 2nd ed. 2005.

This was a great book to have read prior to many others and is very foundational to the development of the rest of my thoughts for a course in my doctoral training… and for life.

I truly appreciated not only the style and manner this book was written but the biblical scholarship is very solid. I don’t agree with the author’s assessment of consecration (I believe we consecrate and God sanctifies). God won’t sanctify what we don’t consecrate. Consecrating is our setting aside those things that are to be holy. Nevertheless, I have actually vocalized what this book has taught on a couple of occasions—it is that formative and conceptualizing to me.

The creation of God was declared ‘good’ and so are the laws God put into place to govern His creation. Those laws haven’t changed but we do need discover them and “have dominion over them”. This is what true science is supposed to be about. When we discover the laws of God, not only in the material world, but also in the relational world, we understand that there are right and wrongs ways of doing things in every area of life.

“Everywhere we discover limits and properties, standards and criteria: in every field of human affairs there are right and wrong ways of doing things. There is nothing in human life that does not belong to the created order” (25). Family, church, businesses, schools all have structures grounded in the realities of God’s world order (and are not arbitrary in their configuration).

“The Lord teaches the farmer his business. There is a right way and wrong way to farm-—plow, sow, thresh—depending on the grain he is growing—dill, spelt, wheat, cumin-—all must be treated differently. The LORD teaches the farmer these things. This is not a revelation through Moses, the Law and Prophets; this is a revelation that comes through creation—the soil, the seeds, and the tools of his daily experience. It is by listening to the voice of God in the work of his hands that the farmer finds the way of agricultural wisdom” (33). And the creation order is knowable. If there is a right way to grow a church, then it is knowable. There are given creational norms for all of life. And they are knowable.

“God’s revelation in creation is not verbal (38)…Mankind has in large measure lost the capacity to interpret what the heavens are saying in their wordless message.” This is a perplexing paradox to me. I now believe that creation is by design and that from understanding that design—-its patterns and laws/structure and direction—-we can know more about our God and about life on this planet.

I also believe that by these laws we learn that there is a right way and a wrong way to do things. But what I think and what others think on the line of what is the right way to do something must not be weighed pragmatically. You cannot run a business like a family, nor a school like a business. Maybe it depends on the way you see the family? Or perhaps it takes more discovering the path with the light of the Scriptures.

History is the generational unfolding and opening up of the possibilities hidden in the womb of creation, both natural and human (43). The mandate to develop creation is being fulfilled in history. E. Stanley Jones stated this much too in his devotional book Spiritual Maturity. “Adam and Eve had not yet reached the level of development that God had planned for them” (46). Is he stating that he believes this unfolding of creation continues even into the new heavens and new earth order? Jones believed so.

“Bondage has to do with the enslavement to a spiritual empire. Mankind’s responsibility is never diminished when it is linked to the powers of darkness.” This tells me Satan operates according to the laws that govern the creation as well. He has to submit to set patterns for evil itself to pervert (can you say 'computer virus'?). It has to control first before the damage is done—so Satan has to control humanity before the good earth can be infected. Let's not let him get that control.

I think this will be a book I refer to over and over again. Get it, read it, live it!

Popular posts from this blog

Banning Influencers at Church?

 You might be getting The Pour Over into your inbox each day as I do. As I read one of the highlighted articles, Why are cafes, restaurants, and even towns banning influences ?  I thought of two things: A popular video game and the Church. The [Galactic Civ] video game action arena is space and utilizes exploring with several different tactics. One is cultural expansion deploying techniques for taking over the galaxy using mods to influence other traveling species with your culture and therefore "quietly" take over the galaxy and win the game. You could also win by buying up all of the other planets (economic takeover--think China?), or by hostile takeovers and warfare (think Russia?).  I like to use the cultural takeover mostly these days. The article lists the reasons for the ban, one is logistical (small-town shops cannot handle triple+ visitors due to a rise in popularity resulting in more harm than good). I imagined a small church of older people spiking due to a popular

Revelation's Whore as Today's Culture

  https://thehustle.co/originals/why-you-almost-never-see-a-clock-at-the-mall The word “whore” may have different definitions to some, but I want to use it as a woman who markets herself for the sole purpose of robbing men of their life for her own gain--whatever her “gain” is: monetary, lust, or otherwise. She is the reverse-consumer and profiteer at the same time, a vampiress, a luxurious drunk, functioning alcoholic. Her appeal is a marketing scheme based on not just years of study, but an exquisite composition of research and development where she is both scientist and evidence, psychologist and client--in an endless cycle and sinister feedback loop of trial and error, hypothesis and investigation, feeding and consuming. All the while tricking you into believing you are the main character. But it isn’t about you. You have entered her Nirvana constructed for you to “remain inside” her. Once her legs are wrapped around you, she is sure to suck your life away. And as titillating a

Who you going to call?

I had a coworker who was a very-likeable person, but seemed in competition with everyone. He was a funny guy, I'll give him that, but most of the time engaged in rather shallow conversations. He knew a little about everything, which caused him to have an opinion about . . . well, everything. And his wit made you want to listen. Most of the time, it is a fun, light-hearted space to work in. Likeable people, are just that: likeable. There are several people I have worked with over the years like this--very friendly, likeable, fairly easy to talk to, yet never really wanted to go deeper. In fact, if conversation turned that way, they became uncomfortable and either remained silent, tried to change the subject, or simply left the circle.  We all need someone we can go deep with. This is the kind of person you'd want to tell others you know or ask if they do. They are not the kind of person you'd call if your spouse ended up in the hospital, or your parent died, or your kid was

Family Time Videos