Skip to main content

How "Thinking For" Extends Adolescence

A reaction to Walt Mueller's, The Space Between: A Parents’ Guide to Teenage Development, 2009.

This book was an easy read—straight forward and well laid out. The book has footnotes with regards to research, but doesn’t seem to be written to be a textbook with substantial research supporting the claims that are being made. My comments will be with regards to having additional material in certain sections and clarifying remarks in others.

“Some view adolescence as something to survive. Rather we should see it as a God-given opportunity to depend on God for guidance and wisdom that would not only help us point our kids to the cross and spiritual maturity, but take us there as well” (p10). I read these same words in another book several years ago and have continued to hold on to them. It helps to hear them again. In several cases parents have set their teens up for ungodly attitudes reminding them, “When you are 18 you can move out and do what you want then!” Parents need to maximize the little time they have with their teen! I believe that is what is at the heart of the author in writing this book.

If adolescence is “primarily a social and economic invention”, shouldn’t there be more serious investigation to its inventor (Satan/World)? Should more be done than just to look at adolescence from a “it-is-what-it-is” sort of way? The whys behind adolescence may be rooted in deeper issues than a headliner, “Baby boom: Marketer’s heaven and Media’s job security”—both areas have their remote controls given to the ‘god of this world’.

“Because our teenagers are growing the ever-changing years of adolescence, they’re incredibly vulnerable to the youth culture’s ability to shape their values, attitudes, and behaviors. And the fact that a growing number of competing messages come to our teens from a variety of directions makes it that much more confusing, frustrating, and difficult for parents of teenagers to understand an connect with their kids”(p18-19). Could this be an insight into the schemes of our enemy? What of the spiritual warfare realm and mentioning it in this book? Perhaps more attention could have been given to remind parents of our enemy and our invisible weapons.

“Independence is the goal of adolescence” (p23). Dr. Mueller reminds us that our role as a parent of teens, in essence, is to prepare them for independence in service for the Lord. To love them, train them, and then let them go entrusted to their heavenly Father. I would add “for the purpose of being the seeds of hope for the next generation!” Many Scriptures have the next generation in mind as well as the importance of training our children for its sake such as: Psalm 78:6 and Joel 1:3.

With regards to “Think With, Not For” (p67), more examples would be helpful but I totally agree. With the words, “challenge our teenager to reflect on issues about which you might not see eye to eye” I also agreed. So often parents have a “my way or the highway” attitude and they reap what they sow! Rather, let your kids learn how to argue well, and to stand up for what they believe in. This helps you to hear what they are thinking and even more—it helps them to hear what they are thinking. Discussion helps them take ownership of their own faith—and so does a good, open-minded argument.

I thought the author could have provided more examples of “being prophetic” (p107)--how to do this, what it looks like, sounds like, and feels like. This is an important point and one that needs substantiated. One good story at least would have been helpful.

Overall, a great book for parents to read again and again!

Popular posts from this blog

I Wish We'd All Been ... Left Behind

  Perhaps you have heard the group DC Talk sing the remake of Larry Norman’s’ song, “I Wish We’d All Been Ready”? There is something tragically deceptive about the lyrics though. As we sing along, we find ourselves participating in a couple instances where we wish we had been ready to be taken instead of left behind. But that is not how Jesus tells his side of the story. The words are inspired by Matthew 24:40-41. But let’s look more closely, shall we? MATTHEW 24:37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away . That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 40 Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. 41 Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left. ...

IN ESSENTIALS, UNITY

I just had a board meeting where I went over a study on the word "unity" and "divisions." The question that immediately came up was, "Well, Christians don't have to agree on everything...right?" My response went something like this, "Well, wouldn't we want to?" It hit the fan like a lead balloon, which is not at all what I had expected. I thought all of the other board members would be shouting, "Yes!" and giving me high-fives and chest bumps. Well, maybe not chest bumps at this age.  There were some other ideas, thoughts and opinions expressed, and I was like, "We just went over this study of like 25 verses that state we are to be unified and have no divisions among us. Why don't you get it?" Seems like I was the one who actually didn't get it. It wasn't that I thought my interpretations were wrong, the weren't. The question centered around their application. "How in the world are we to agree on e...

Review: Evangelism More Caught than Taught

I teach Evangelism & Discipleship I & II online for a Christian University in Ohio. I was looking over an assignment that really threw me for a curve because the exercise goes against what the course is teaching. The course uses as one of its textbooks, Becoming a Contagious Christian: Communicating Your Faith in a Style that Fits You, which teaches that there are several ways of evangelizing referred to as "styles" and that there isn't only one acceptable way. Those styles are: Direct style, Intellectual style, Invitational style, and Serving style. Then the course has students read an article that emphasizes one style (Direct, or perhaps Intellectual) and asks them to attempt to do so. The article gives the following statement for its rationale: "We are dedicated to equipping people for evangelism, not because large numbers follow us, but because it is the command Jesus gave to His followers. We don’t take others with us for OJT because it’s c...

Family Time Videos