Skip to main content

Don't Trivialize Human Experiences--Enlarge Them!

William D. Romanowski, Eyes Wide Open: Looking For God In Pop Culture (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press) 2009.

Remarking about the kind of faith informed engagement with popular art and culture, Romanowski states that, “Our aim should be to preserve the best features, improve the weakest parts, and eliminate the worst traits of popular art” (23). This is really what the entire book sets out to show us how to do—practically, emotionally, spiritually, but most of all with great discernment.

This really is a very good book! At each turn with the author’s setting up of his point-illustration-principle-vision layout, many times I found myself guessing correctly which movie he was going to be citing next. I found this statement on paradigm shifts needing to happen very interesting: “The change is signified by a remaking of cultural perceptions and the introduction of new questions and standards for acceptable solutions” (p35). With the fast pace of technological advancements and media’s barrage of information and formatting, I believe the church is the throws of trying to find some new standards and solutions today. And with “four out of five teenagers” having read a Harry Potter book or seen one of the movies from this series “with the majority having no discussion with church leaders or parents about the supernatural elements” (p39). This really needs to change. We as Christians need to be and stay informed and be outspoken with a faith-based appraisal of what our culture is consuming—our “market-driven, therapeutic, narcissistic and entertainment-oriented” culture (p40). And the author believes Christians need to be more forthright in their belief in God’s sovereign rule and demonstrate what real faith looks like in life by creating and using art and music.

I am still thinking about the line, “Most people feel immune to the messages of the popular arts because they view them as mere ‘entertainment’” and he calls this the ‘third person effect’. I am not sure what this 3rd person effect is but the immune part I can relate to. I have been tricked and fooled into thinking at times that “sin” cannot happen to me—and of course my realization has always been too late. What makes me think I am immune? Am I enculturated like a frog in the kettle experiment would suggest? This is an aspect needing redemption!

This book tells us there is a values war going on. We can be too accommodating and accepting of the world’s ideas, ideals, values and attitudes about life that our faithfulness to God is compromised. Our world is telling competing stories day in and out mixed with lies and truths in movies and song with our which conflict with our Christian worldview. And idea comes to us with a promise and we take the bait and before long we establish habits in chasing after the promise which never comes because it’s a lie; and the worse part of this can be that we forget why we are doing the rituals we have in place. The promise has been forgotten with its lies. We are left with empty patterns that suck the life away from us until we invest into another bankrupt promise. Such can be the danger of our willing suspension of disbelief and confiscated imaginations.

The author is on to something when he said, “People want to be entertained at the same time as we want to be affirmed”. Many times I catalogue a sermon as “good” when it has reviewed so well what I already believe. It is wonderful to know and be assured that I believe as true really is. When it comes to the cultural arena I need to remember that the “greater the pleasure, the less one notices and examines the cultural message” (p103). And that is a horrific thought. And although we have a legitimate need for entertainment, “people conform to the image of the god they serve” and this ends up shaping “their ideals, values, attitudes, and beliefs and also JUSTIFIES THEIR ACTIONS” (p152). This really hit me in convicting fashion. Has my justification for things I have wanted to do been attached to God or to one of my gods?

Movies do more than tell us—they show us. In fact the author states this is the arts at their best. And many of the best movies show us what life is like and ask us to take a look at it from their perspective. And as a Christian I must be on my guard not to TRIVIALIZE human experience but instead try to ENLARGE it (p161). God’s image is upon us all and our deepest longing is for Him therefore I can see this expressed in almost all art forms and the stories movies seek to portray. I want to do a better job not at just pinpointing the philosophy behind movies, but what to celebrate in the story that resonates with my story of redemption and God’s story for us all.

Popular posts from this blog

Banning Influencers at Church?

 You might be getting The Pour Over into your inbox each day as I do. As I read one of the highlighted articles, Why are cafes, restaurants, and even towns banning influences ?  I thought of two things: A popular video game and the Church. The [Galactic Civ] video game action arena is space and utilizes exploring with several different tactics. One is cultural expansion deploying techniques for taking over the galaxy using mods to influence other traveling species with your culture and therefore "quietly" take over the galaxy and win the game. You could also win by buying up all of the other planets (economic takeover--think China?), or by hostile takeovers and warfare (think Russia?).  I like to use the cultural takeover mostly these days. The article lists the reasons for the ban, one is logistical (small-town shops cannot handle triple+ visitors due to a rise in popularity resulting in more harm than good). I imagined a small church of older people spiking due to a popular

Revelation's Whore as Today's Culture

  https://thehustle.co/originals/why-you-almost-never-see-a-clock-at-the-mall The word “whore” may have different definitions to some, but I want to use it as a woman who markets herself for the sole purpose of robbing men of their life for her own gain--whatever her “gain” is: monetary, lust, or otherwise. She is the reverse-consumer and profiteer at the same time, a vampiress, a luxurious drunk, functioning alcoholic. Her appeal is a marketing scheme based on not just years of study, but an exquisite composition of research and development where she is both scientist and evidence, psychologist and client--in an endless cycle and sinister feedback loop of trial and error, hypothesis and investigation, feeding and consuming. All the while tricking you into believing you are the main character. But it isn’t about you. You have entered her Nirvana constructed for you to “remain inside” her. Once her legs are wrapped around you, she is sure to suck your life away. And as titillating a

Who you going to call?

I had a coworker who was a very-likeable person, but seemed in competition with everyone. He was a funny guy, I'll give him that, but most of the time engaged in rather shallow conversations. He knew a little about everything, which caused him to have an opinion about . . . well, everything. And his wit made you want to listen. Most of the time, it is a fun, light-hearted space to work in. Likeable people, are just that: likeable. There are several people I have worked with over the years like this--very friendly, likeable, fairly easy to talk to, yet never really wanted to go deeper. In fact, if conversation turned that way, they became uncomfortable and either remained silent, tried to change the subject, or simply left the circle.  We all need someone we can go deep with. This is the kind of person you'd want to tell others you know or ask if they do. They are not the kind of person you'd call if your spouse ended up in the hospital, or your parent died, or your kid was

Family Time Videos