Skip to main content

How The Good Samaritan Turned Off His Cell Phone,or How Facebook Erodes Intimacy

Reaction to: Shane Hipps, Flickering Pixels: How Technology Shapes Your Faith, 2009.

This book really preaches. It is one of those books that doesn’t just tell you how to do it—it is doing it while it is telling you how! If we look at our computer screens and refocus we can actually see our own reflection on the screen (or the outline of our reflection)—this reminds us of who we are and that we are not our computers (and our computers are not us). This “magic eye” methodology—the training of the eye to see what is there but normally overlooked—is how we need to approach the technological advances of today as well as how we live our lives as the Church in the world.

We must walk the line however fine it may be between observing the 2nd Commandment of not making for ourselves graven images and using images to convey a message. The methods we chose speak a message themselves as Marshall McLuhan was quoted, “the medium is the message” (25). Even the television screen is a part of the message. Media is not neutral. Instead, “it has the power to shape us, regardless of content, and we cannot evaluate them solely on their content” (26). As we “extend” ourselves through our various inventions the more the world changes—how we live, practice our faith and imagine God. This caused me to revisit an old belief and begin to loosen its hold me—that the message and the medium are separate; that the medium can change but the message must stay the same is no longer a valid belief.
I have told my children the story of Narcissus and have now added how his problem wasn’t that he fell in love with himself; but rather he failed to recognize himself in the water/mirror. He became numb to his image and couldn’t see the mirror and he eventually died. Had Narcissus understood that it was water reflecting his own face, the mirror’s power would have been dispelled and he could have gained control over it. I also told them the story of how Perseus used a mirror/shield to see Medusa’s reflection so he could kill her and bring peace to the land. “…when we remember that technology is simply an extension of ourselves, it takes much of the power away from the medium and returns it to us” p36.

We become what we behold. The tools we use to think actually shape the way we think. The same applies to our faith as well. The printed word can use subliminal messages to control people without their knowledge. “Regardless of what is being communicated, the printed word whispers subliminal messages (you’re an individual) as we read. The subject matter (remain objective) could be anything. Regardless of the content, we are (think abstractly) powerfully shaped by the form (think rationally) of the words alone”p55.

Our challenge: prioritizing (filtering), meaning making (mosaic barrage), and responsibility (overload). Authority, truth & meaning—these three. Can they be established with clarity and certainty? “If we are not alert, the Information Age may stunt our growth and create a permanent puberty of the mind” p72. Beliefs should change the world. Our theology and practice are deeply informed and shaped by our media and technology.

Facebook erodes relational intimacy. Intimacy is created when we do something with someone we don’t do with anyone else. The illusion of closeness while remaining anonymous—Facebook. Anonymous intimacy has a strange effect. It has just enough connection to keep us from pursuing real intimacy. AUTHENTIC COMMUNITY INVOLVES HIGH DEGREES OF INTIMACY, PERMANENCE, and PROXIMITY! What happens when intimacy can be gained without permanence and proximity?

What happens when we choose cotton candy as a normal meal? As our only meal? = Facebook. Where eating and being together is nice but not essential. Facebook. Being in touch versus truly connecting with others? Facebook. E-conflict--“if your brother sins against you, don’t email (or text) him about it!” Anonymous intimacy and distant hostility—Facebook. This has not only become possible but is encouraged by our culture.

Paul didn’t demand that others agree with him—-he just lived it (the message and the medium are one). Does technology matter to God? Does He talk about it at all? Use of media in the Bible = the tabernacle furnishings and no graven images = “exactly like the pattern I will show you” = The chest, the atonement cover, the cherubim, the ark, the lampstand, tabernacle, altar, courtyard, priestly garments, atonement money, washing basin, anointing oil, incense…(Exodus 25-30). If God is so concerned about such things in the Bronze Age, how about in the iPod age?

But God spoke through His greatest medium ever when He came Himself—perfectly united medium and message. “Jesus is God’s perfect medium—and the medium is the message! And we, the church, ARE the message. The church isn’t to be a message of perfection—but of a community of humility, repentance, and authentic hope. Technology is an extension of me and an amplified imitation of my humanness—created in God’s image, they are also extensions of God—Who found perfect expression in Jesus…and then the body = the church…and me. Go ye therefore and BE the message!

Perhaps a good sermon title today would be, How The Good Samaritan Turned OFF His Cell Phone.

Popular posts from this blog

Banning Influencers at Church?

 You might be getting The Pour Over into your inbox each day as I do. As I read one of the highlighted articles, Why are cafes, restaurants, and even towns banning influences ?  I thought of two things: A popular video game and the Church. The [Galactic Civ] video game action arena is space and utilizes exploring with several different tactics. One is cultural expansion deploying techniques for taking over the galaxy using mods to influence other traveling species with your culture and therefore "quietly" take over the galaxy and win the game. You could also win by buying up all of the other planets (economic takeover--think China?), or by hostile takeovers and warfare (think Russia?).  I like to use the cultural takeover mostly these days. The article lists the reasons for the ban, one is logistical (small-town shops cannot handle triple+ visitors due to a rise in popularity resulting in more harm than good). I imagined a small church of older people spiking due to a popular

Revelation's Whore as Today's Culture

  https://thehustle.co/originals/why-you-almost-never-see-a-clock-at-the-mall The word “whore” may have different definitions to some, but I want to use it as a woman who markets herself for the sole purpose of robbing men of their life for her own gain--whatever her “gain” is: monetary, lust, or otherwise. She is the reverse-consumer and profiteer at the same time, a vampiress, a luxurious drunk, functioning alcoholic. Her appeal is a marketing scheme based on not just years of study, but an exquisite composition of research and development where she is both scientist and evidence, psychologist and client--in an endless cycle and sinister feedback loop of trial and error, hypothesis and investigation, feeding and consuming. All the while tricking you into believing you are the main character. But it isn’t about you. You have entered her Nirvana constructed for you to “remain inside” her. Once her legs are wrapped around you, she is sure to suck your life away. And as titillating a

Who you going to call?

I had a coworker who was a very-likeable person, but seemed in competition with everyone. He was a funny guy, I'll give him that, but most of the time engaged in rather shallow conversations. He knew a little about everything, which caused him to have an opinion about . . . well, everything. And his wit made you want to listen. Most of the time, it is a fun, light-hearted space to work in. Likeable people, are just that: likeable. There are several people I have worked with over the years like this--very friendly, likeable, fairly easy to talk to, yet never really wanted to go deeper. In fact, if conversation turned that way, they became uncomfortable and either remained silent, tried to change the subject, or simply left the circle.  We all need someone we can go deep with. This is the kind of person you'd want to tell others you know or ask if they do. They are not the kind of person you'd call if your spouse ended up in the hospital, or your parent died, or your kid was

Family Time Videos